<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DINOSAURS IN COLOUR!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/</link>
	<description>Items and links about all things zoological</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weird and Wonderful &#8211; 3 &#171; Sam&#39;s Adventures</title>
		<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Weird and Wonderful &#8211; 3 &#171; Sam&#39;s Adventures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://z-letter.com/?p=881#comment-221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] people have blogged about this, among them Ed Yong (1, 2), Matthew Cobb from the Uni of Manchester(1, 2) and Jerry Coyne (1, 2). Basically they all blog about the same two articles but the points made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people have blogged about this, among them Ed Yong (1, 2), Matthew Cobb from the Uni of Manchester(1, 2) and Jerry Coyne (1, 2). Basically they all blog about the same two articles but the points made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cobb</title>
		<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Cobb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://z-letter.com/?p=881#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See latest post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See latest post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finch</title>
		<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://z-letter.com/?p=881#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although interesting, I see nothing surprising in this article. It is just one of a number of &quot;cosmetic&quot; articles that journals like Nature love to publish. I mean there is not much science in this article, but many funny and cool things for newspapers and media, in general. Moreover, the title of this article, as well as many statements done throughout the text, are very misleading. In fact, the results of this study just show that some coelurosaurs had pigments in their (proto)feathers, while the authors use the term &quot;dinosaurs&quot;, which includes many many more species than coelurosaurs does. Of course, it is more cool to say that dinosaurs had colors, but this statement is not scientific and conveys the false message that dinosaurs like T. rex or Triceratops had colored feathers. Just imagine if Spielberg just read the title and decides to make a Jurassic Park 4 with a T. rex in red and blue feathers! Yes, very cool, but not real!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although interesting, I see nothing surprising in this article. It is just one of a number of &#8220;cosmetic&#8221; articles that journals like Nature love to publish. I mean there is not much science in this article, but many funny and cool things for newspapers and media, in general. Moreover, the title of this article, as well as many statements done throughout the text, are very misleading. In fact, the results of this study just show that some coelurosaurs had pigments in their (proto)feathers, while the authors use the term &#8220;dinosaurs&#8221;, which includes many many more species than coelurosaurs does. Of course, it is more cool to say that dinosaurs had colors, but this statement is not scientific and conveys the false message that dinosaurs like T. rex or Triceratops had colored feathers. Just imagine if Spielberg just read the title and decides to make a Jurassic Park 4 with a T. rex in red and blue feathers! Yes, very cool, but not real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bex</title>
		<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://z-letter.com/?p=881#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sure this is a very relevant issue? I mean, yes, it may be interesting ... the possibility to provide some (feeble) inferences on behaviour, maybe even metabolism. But maybe this is not so amazing. Maybe it is just … cool: arresting images, nice colours, and the old stuff about charming dinosaurs. “Nature” seems to love appealing news, they are more attractive that … “tedious science”! Maybe dinosaurs had blue tails, maybe Neanderthals had red hair. Science or gossip? Once more, this is interesting, but … so much interesting?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure this is a very relevant issue? I mean, yes, it may be interesting &#8230; the possibility to provide some (feeble) inferences on behaviour, maybe even metabolism. But maybe this is not so amazing. Maybe it is just … cool: arresting images, nice colours, and the old stuff about charming dinosaurs. “Nature” seems to love appealing news, they are more attractive that … “tedious science”! Maybe dinosaurs had blue tails, maybe Neanderthals had red hair. Science or gossip? Once more, this is interesting, but … so much interesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feathered dinosaurs—in color! &#171; Why Evolution Is True</title>
		<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feathered dinosaurs—in color! &#171; Why Evolution Is True]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://z-letter.com/?p=881#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] dinosaurs—in&#160;color!  I was going to post on this, but Matthew Cobb beat me to it.  (If you&#8217;re not looking in at his online Z-letter, you&#8217;re missing some good [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dinosaurs—in&nbsp;color!  I was going to post on this, but Matthew Cobb beat me to it.  (If you&#8217;re not looking in at his online Z-letter, you&#8217;re missing some good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kolory dinozaurów &#171; Remote sensing i ekologia</title>
		<link>http://z-letter.com/2010/01/27/dinosaurs-in-colour/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kolory dinozaurów &#171; Remote sensing i ekologia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://z-letter.com/?p=881#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Grafikę przedstawiającą prawdopodobne ubarwienie tego dinozaura przedstawia grafika (znaleziona na blogu The Z-Letter Archive): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grafikę przedstawiającą prawdopodobne ubarwienie tego dinozaura przedstawia grafika (znaleziona na blogu The Z-Letter Archive): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

